Monday, January 21, 2008

It really IS all about CONTROL

Having undone 200 years of US Constitutional law, the NYC city council member who gutted whatever RKBA was left in that city isn't content with the amount of control he is exerting on New Yorkers.

One example on background:

A new gun control law authored by City Councilmember Peter Vallone Jr. and used as the basis of a lawsuit brought by the Bloomberg mayoral administration against several major gun manufacturers and distributors was given the go-ahead in Brooklyn federal court . . .

The package of legislation that gave rise to the city lawsuit first came before the council Public Safety Committee, of which Vallone is chair, last November.

One bill, Intro 365, created a “code of responsible conduct for gun dealers and manufacturers and makes it possible to hold them financially liable to a victim of gun violence or their family,” according to a news release issued by Vallone at the time.

Under Intro 365, a gun dealer would be liable for any injuries or death if the dealer fails to follow responsible sales practices such as selling only from a storefront location and not from a home, automobile or gun show, selling only one gun per individual within a 30-day period and maintaining records of all sales.

And another:
Massive anti-gunowner NYC legislation c.2005

City Hall, NY – City Council Speaker Gifford Miller, together with Council Members Peter Vallone, Jr., Chair of the Committee on Public Safety, David Yassky, Eva Moskowitz, Chair of the Committee on Education, announced the passage of a package of legislation that strengthens the City’s gun safety measures, including its existing assault weapons ban, and implements some of the strongest measures in the nation for promoting gun safety and reducing gun-related crimes and deaths.

Under the legislation, a gun dealer will be liable for any injuries or death if the dealer fails to follow responsible sales practices such as selling only from a storefront location and not from a home, automobile or gun show, selling only one gun per individual within a 30-day period, and maintaining records of all sales. A gun manufacturer will be liable if the manufacturer sold a weapon to a dealer, knowing the dealer had sold twenty or more crime guns during any 12-month period in the preceding five years.

The New York City assault weapons ban will be strengthened with the passage of Intro. 469-A by:
• Prohibiting any person who violates the assault weapons ban from obtaining a license to possess, purchase or sell a rifle or shotgun
• Increasing the civil penalty for violating the ban from $10,000 to $25,000
• Requiring the NYPD to inspect and update its list of assault weapons at least three times a year and
• Creating a new provision to allow that (at the discretion of the Police Commissioner) any person who violates the ban have all their guns seized.

Other bills passed today will limit the acquisition of a rifle or shotgun to one per ninety-day period, prohibit the sale of a rifle or shotgun to anyone under the age of twenty-one, and prohibit the sale of more than one rifle or shotgun to any person as part of the same sales transaction

SOOO the NYPD gets to declare what's an "Assault weapon," and if you happen to have one on the day of the decree, even if you legally owned it with the NYC BS red tape in order, you get jail time AND no further RKBA.

(Somehow, the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association actually ENDORSED this Vallone idiot)

Now he wants to "license and register" all air quality testing equipment in NYC. Yep, a DIY home radon test will get you jail time if Grade-A specimen PETER VALLONE, JR. (that's V-A-L-L-O-N-E) gets his way:

Village Voice

Runnin' Scared
NYPD Seeks an Air Monitor Crackdown for New Yorkers
A city councilman and the cops don't want you to have that Geiger counter without their permission

by Chris Thompson
January 15th, 2008 5:13 PM

Damn you, Osama bin Laden! Here's another rotten thing you've done to us: After 9/11, untold thousands of New Yorkers bought machines that detect traces of biological, chemical, and radiological weapons. But a lot of these machines didn't work right, and when they registered false alarms, the police had to spend millions of dollars chasing bad leads and throwing the public into a state of raw panic.

OK, none of that has actually happened. But Richard Falkenrath, the NYPD's deputy commissioner for counterterrorism, knows that it's just a matter of time. That's why he and Mayor Michael Bloomberg have asked the City Council to pass a law requiring anyone who wants to own such detectors to get a permit from the police first. And it's not just devices to detect weaponized anthrax that they want the power to control, but those that detect everything from industrial pollutants to asbestos in shoddy apartments. Want to test for pollution in low-income neighborhoods with high rates of childhood asthma? Gotta ask the cops for permission. Why? So you "will not lead to excessive false alarms and unwarranted anxiety," the first draft of the law states.

Last week, Falkenrath made his case for the new law before the City Council's Public Safety Committee, where Councilman Peter Vallone introduced the bill and chaired the hearing. Dozens of university researchers, public-health professionals, and environmental lawyers sat in the crowd, horrified by the prospect that if this law passes, their work detecting and warning the public about airborne pollutants will become next to impossible. But Falkenrath pressed on, saying that unless the police can determine who gets to look for nasty stuff floating in the air, the city would be paralyzed by fear.

"There are currently no guidelines regulating the private acquisition of biological, chemical, and radiological detectors," warned Falkenrath, adding that this law was suggested by officials within the Department of Homeland Security. "There are no consistent standards for the type of detectors used, no requirement that they be reported to the police department—or anyone else, for that matter—and no mechanism for coordinating these devices. . . . Our mutual goal is to prevent false alarms . . . by making sure we know where these detectors are located, and that they conform to standards of quality and reliability."

Vallone nodded his head, duly moved by Falkenrath's presentation. Nevertheless, he had a few concerns. When the Environmental Protection Agency promised that the air surrounding Ground Zero was safe, Vallone said, independent testers proved that such assurances were utterly false. Would these groups really have to get a permit before they started working? "It's a good question, and it has come up prior to this hearing," Falkenrath replied. "What I can assure you is that we will look extremely carefully at this issue of the independent groups, and get the opinion of the other city agencies on how to handle that, and craft an appropriate response." And if people use these detectors without a permit, Vallone asked, do we really have to put them in jail? Afraid so, Falkenrath answered.

Councilman John Liu was considerably less impressed. Why, he asked, should a community group like Asthma-Free School Zones have to tell anyone, much less the police department, that they're testing for air pollution? "We have no interest in regulating air-quality sensors around schools," Falkenrath promised. "That's not what this is about."

"But then can't we just get that in the legislation from the outset, as opposed to putting it in the regulations afterwards?" asked Liu.

That, said Falkenrath, was asking too much. "It becomes a very slippery slope, and it would then be possible for many other entities to sort of drive things through that loophole."

And Liu was just the start of the critics' parade. Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer said the bill aims to fix a problem that doesn't even exist. "I cannot think of evidence or events in our recent past involving false alarms that would create any urgency for this sweeping legislation," he said. "If Manhattanites have any anxiety related to this bill, it is the very marked anxiety that residents have about their air quality."

Dave Newman, an industrial hygienist for the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health, claimed that under this law, the West Virginia air-quality experts who tested the air after 9/11 would have been a bunch of criminals. Dave Kotelchuck, deputy director of the New York/New Jersey Education and Research Center, pointed out the absurdity of having police regulate and permit research science. "Think about industrial-hygiene folks who are going from Boston to Atlanta to measure, and have atmospheric detectors," he said. "They land in LaGuardia and JFK. As soon as they land, because possession is a misdemeanor, they've committed a misdemeanor. They're not going to test in New York City; they're just travelling through. But possession, which is the way the law has stated it, alone is a misdemeanor—not use. Not attempting to make measurements—just possession. That is just unwarranted."

After an hour of this, poor Peter Vallone looked shell-shocked. He had planned to fast-track this legislation—in fact, the law was supposed to have been voted on last week—but that was before the critics had heard about it. As the opposition mounted, Vallone pulled the proposed legislation just before the meeting's end and agreed to give it a second look. "When I was first given a briefing only weeks ago, the potential problems did occur to me," he said in a later interview. "But the extent of the opposition, on such short notice, was a bit surprising."

But don't think Vallone has given up or anything. He and his colleagues will try to accommodate all the concerns when they redraft the bill, he said, but one way or another, the cops are going to have this new power. "No one's going to be completely happy in the end," Vallone said, "but I think the police department gave some very impressive testimony on the stand, and also expressed a willingness to listen to concerns." After all, if you let research scientists and community groups do their jobs, the terrorists will have already won.

I had to reprint the whole thing in case the Voice pulls it from the website.

Reason number one million and five why I am glad I am out of that rat-infested hell hole that is NYC.



Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page